I’m also scared by the comments on Turley’s blog, which seem to be “suck it up, you dumb ortho jews.” in the original article in the post, it was made clear that Children’s was not complaining about the cost (although I’m skeptical) but the diversion of a bed and staff to keep the patient alive. I agree that the hospital can legitimately say “we are a not-for-profit institution and we can’t afford to keep this kid alive when there is no possibility of recovery and the kid is clinically dead.” But if cost is not an issue, I’m not sure that their approach is right.