Menachem Mendel

Menachem Mendel RSS Feed
 
 
 
 

War on Shabbat

Gil at Hirhurim has a post discussing the description from the First Book of Maccabees 2:31-41 of how at first some of the rebels would not fight back on Shabbat, and it was only after they were slaughtered that the decision was made to fight on Shabbat. “So they made this decision that day: “Let us fight against every man who comes to attack us on the sabbath day; let us not all die as our brethren died in their hiding places.” (I Macc. 2:41) The prohibition against fighting on Shabbat is also known from the Book of Jubilees 50:12-13. As Prof. M.D. Herr has pointed out, from the text in First Maccabees we can see that the later rabbinic concept of pikuah nefesh was unknown to them at that time. When waging battle was finally permitted on Shabbat, it was more in the context of the permission to wage war on Shabbat and not necessarily related to a general principle that saving life takes precedence over the observance of Shabbat. What was the Shabbat prohibition that they would have violated if they would have fought back? It could have been that they did not want to leave their hiding places, not wanting to leave their dwelling place on the Sabbath. Another possibility is that they did not want to take a human life on the Sabbath (see Jubilees). A third possibility is offered by Y.D. Gilat who sees the episode in First Maccabees as reflecting a period when people were very strict regarding the prohibition of muktzeh (Gilat, pp. 95-96).

Sources:

Y.D. Gilat, Yad Le-Gilat; Jonathan Goldstein, The First Book of Maccabees in the Anchor Bible Series; M.D. Herr, “Le-Baayat Hilchot Milchamah Be-Shabbat…”, Tarbitz 30.

One Response to “War on Shabbat”

  1. 1
    Menachem Mendel:

    You might also consider that Ptolemy I Soter took Jerusalem in 320 BCE (maybe 312) by what is delicately referred to as a “strategem” – showing up on Shabbat, when they wouldn’t fight against him (ah, Agatharchides!). Which would appear to argue in favour of the explanation aluded to in Jubilies.
    Nusachanglia | 03.12.07 – 1:15 pm | #

    It is also worth looking at Antiquities, 18:310-379 — which describes a short lived Jewish principality in Mesopotamia around the 1st cen. CE.

    In the story,a local Parthian governor tried attacking the Jews on the Sabbath, assuming that the Jews would not fight. It seems that the Jews initially refused to bear arms until they were rallied to defend themselves by their leaders (they won!).

    I am not sure how this fits into the big picture of fighting on shabbat. The jews did fight- but perhaps this reflects a lax attitude towards the Sabbath laws. Also,it is interesting that the Parthians were knowledgeably of the idea that Jews didn’t fight on Shabbat.

    Plus this is all from Josephus so who the heck knows what to really make of it all.
    ariel simon | 03.13.07 – 4:14 pm | #

Categories

Tags

Archives

Recent Posts

Meta

Sign up for an email subscribtion to this blog.

Michael Pitkowsky

Biblioblogs

Daf Yomi

History

Israel

Jewish Law

Judaica

Law and Legal History

Politics

Religion

Talmud